A still from "Black Panther" 2018
In
the Hollywood movie “The black panther”, the character Killmonger’s anger
towards the outside world is very easily connected to the audience. The filmmakers
didn’t need to spend so much time to convey the discrimination that Is happening,
a few montage shots of Killmonger’s childhood in the real world and a climax
shot of that character’s redemption were all enough for the audience to empathize
with the character. This convenience of spending less time to point out the discrimination
was effectively used for the world-building of the movie and to provide every
high moment that a superhero movie requires. Now Thangalan is not a superhero
movie but a historical adventure movie then why am I comparing it with black
panther? While Killmonger’s anger and rage towards the outer world and to show
them that they have the power to take over the world can be easily connected
with the audience why not Thangalan or the character Aarathy’s desperate
attempt to hold on to their land of goldfield from any outsider is not easily
connected. That’s because the Indian audiences are new to this subject which is
Dalit history. Black history and struggles have been documented greatly in the
past decades, through books and movies. Numerous mainstream movies talked about
the discrimination in the black community, this helped the filmmakers of black
panther to only subtly convey that emotion and it worked. While The history of discrimination
against the Dalit people has not at all reached the mainstream audience of India.
So Thangalan was expected to be spoon-fed the emotions and the history to the
audience. But Thangalan did not have the time
to spoon-feed, it had a story to tell.
Comments
Post a Comment